Home   |   News   |   What's New   |   Most Read StoriesXML RSS Feed   
 
 

 

Spam Daily News
 
XML RSS Feed

Just click the button to subscribe

Add to My Yahoo!

MSN Alerts

Add to Google

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My AOL

Subscribe with Bloglines

 Podcast (RSS feed)

 

Goodmail rejecting three quarters of applicants

March 09, 2006

 
Goodmail has rejected more than 75% of the companies that have applied for its Certified Email program, according to the company's chief executive, Richard Gingras.


 

 

 

 
TOP STORIES

more   

Gingras said most of the rejections are because the applicants' spam-complaint rates are too high. He declined to specify what constitutes too high a complaint rate.

"Our criteria are very rigorous and the fact of the matter is that a lot of folks out there just don't qualify," he said. "Most senders say they're on AOL's enhanced whitelist and they're not."

AOL maintains two so-called whitelists of senders that meet certain unpublished good-behavior criteria such as low spam complaint rates, and as a result, reportedly have an easier time getting their e-mail delivered intact. The enhanced whitelist is the stricter of the two.

Goodmail will put its stamp of approval only on e-mail to applicants' existing customers or existing members of the applicants' organizations, said Gingras.

Goodmail will also reject applicants if they've been in business less than a year, said Gingras.

John Rizzi, the chief executive of e-mail service provider e-Dialog, said one reason for Goodmail's high rejection rate may be that e-mailers with the most questionable marketing practices are lining up first.

 
Save to Yahoo! My Web

Submit to Fark

Add to Del.icio.us

Add to Ma.gnolia

Submit to Digg
Submit to Shoutwire

Submit to Reddit

Submit to Slashdot

Submit to NowPublic
 

 
   

 

Subscribe  |   Link to Us  |   Syndicate  |   Bookmark Us  |   RSS feed  |   Privacy Policy  |   Contact Us

 

 
Copyright © 2005-2006 Interlink Enterprise Computing. All rights reserved.
All company logos & trademarks displayed on this site belong to their respective owners